![]() |
The governed snookered by the governmentTHEODORE & WOODROW
How two American presidents destroyed Constitutional freedom by Judge Andrew Napolitano The United States government has gone astray, treating the Constitution as some mythical document to be revered and ignored. Wonder why? If so, I suggest you read Theodore and Woodrow by Judge Andrew Napolitano, one of our greatest libertarians and constitutional experts, opposed to politicians who pretend to understand the Constitution. For instance, the US have been at war for decades. Clearly, the founders wanted us to eschew involvement in other countries affairs, unless they threatened us. They were not being selfish, just prudent. The Progressive movement carpet-bombed our previously peaceful existence, particularly Theodore Roosevelt, who believed a great nation should fight for, and acquire, territory like colonial Europe. Far from spreading democracy, the government persuaded the Supreme Court to rule that the Constitution did not apply in full force to territories. Writes Napolitano, The idea that these territories can be governed without the government recognising even the most basic protections of our Constitution is an untenable result largely grounded in the racial theories of the times; racial theories ardently promulgated by Wilson and Roosevelt. ![]() When you control History, you control perception. Judge Napolitano describes how the Progressives, by federalising schools, could indoctrinate Americans to reject their basic freedoms in favour of paternalistic federalism. Led by Teddy Roosevelt and Woody Wilson, they flipped the American experiment from freedom to fascism. Consider what passes for diplomacy in the Progressive era. United States agents:
Those are choice examples of US interference in other countries affairs that have engendered enmity by those affected. As Judge Napolitano observes, The sun never sets on the U.S. military nor on its nine hundred permanent installations throughout the world.
Lets not have a party To reiterate, the Two-Party System is not Constitutionally supported. The supposedly two parties are nearly identical, as exemplified by the two presidents described of this book, one a Republican, the other a Democrat. Roosevelt and Wilson worked together to push our nation into a more Big Government direction. They moved the nation away from its minimalist beginnings into the modern era of overarching government control — a system that both parties, despite their petty squabbles, have consistently worked together to grow. TR-1 and WW-1 set the standard for finding ways around the Constitution in order to claim more power for the federal government and themselves. Thats the key. Claiming to be doing it for our own good, they were helping themselves to more power. ![]() Some of the many issues covered in Theodore and Woodrow…
Education
Trust-busting However, just as in the Progressive Era, the American consumer does not need to be protected from a business; the consumer needs to be protected from the government. Under TR and Wilson, anti-trust was never a way to protect consumers but a way to bring big and powerful companies under the control of the federal government and leave the governments friends alone. …there is no check on the activities of the federal government that are anticompetitive or restrain trade, because it is not subject to its own anti-trust laws. That is what Roosevelt and Wilson wanted, and this is what they brought us.
Undeserved Reserve When Wall Street needed government help, it hurt smaller banks, which were competing effectively, by devising the Federal Reserve. It is a rights-violating, property-stealing, unconstitutional cartel that is sponsored by the government, which is the only thing which makes it legal. Since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, the purchasing power of the dollar has fallen by 90 percent. Inflation has increased 1,000 percent. Thus, when all is tallied, the amount of purchasing power you and I lose to inflation is literally the amount spent by the government.
Constitutional weakening Wilson called himself a benevolent servant rather than the power-hungry authoritarian academic who wanted to bend the country and the Constitution to his will. The progressives wanted the nations foundation to be a living document, subject to unfounded interpretation. When the Constitution is thought of in this manner, the meaning of the Constitution becomes whatever those who run the government say it is.
Isnt larceny grand? We may try to convince ourselves that when the government takes these fruits [of our labour] it is merely the price we pay for law and order, but when we get right down to it, robbery is robbery no matter who perpetrates it. Period. Property was more valuable than currency, so property rights, a cornerstone of the republic, were chiseled away. Infinite RegulationsOn this subject, here is another quote from the book.
While Judge Napolitanos history is informative and wise, it is also infuriating seeing how easily a once-great nation was crippled, with free people trading away their liberty for naught. The Judge pulls no punches, as the brief excerpts above demonstrate. He has written a literate page turner on the first Roosevelt, and the one and only Wilson of the not-so-distant past, with a legacy of disastrous policies that hurt us today. |
||||
©2013 Gary Tutin aka GT Slade |
![]() ![]() ![]() |